<p id="N10019" type="head"> <s id="N1001B">DEL CONTATTO </s> </p>

<p id="N1001D" type="subhead"> <s id="N1001F">COME CAUSA DI ELETTRIZZAZIONE </s> </p>

<p id="N10021" type="subhead2"> <s id="N10023">1792. </s> </p>

</section> <section type="editorcomment"> <table type="sources"> <table.target/> <row> <cell colspan="2"> <p id="N1002E" type="head"> <s id="N10031"><emph type="smallcaps">FONTI</emph>. </s> </p>

</cell> </row> <row> <cell> <p id="N1003B" type="head"> <s id="N1003E"><emph type="smallcaps">Stampate</emph>. </s> </p>

</cell> <cell> <p id="N10047" type="head"> <s id="N1004A"><emph type="smallcaps">Manoscritte</emph>. </s> </p>

<p id="N10051" type="main"> <s id="N10054"><ref>Cart. Volt.: I 21.</ref> </s> </p>

</cell> </row> <row> <cell colspan="2"> <p id="N1005E" type="head"> <s id="N10061"><emph type="smallcaps">Osservazioni</emph>. </s> </p>

<p id="N10068" type="main"> <s id="N1006B"><emph type="smallcaps">Titolo</emph>: <lb/>
<emph type="smallcaps">Data</emph>: I raccordi qui sotto messi in luce, diI 21 con E 24, e di I 21 con lettera del <lb/>
V. a Martino Van Marum in data 11 ottobre 1792, permetterebbero di ritenere <lb/>
I 21 contemporaneo a questa lettera. </s> </p>

<p id="N1007C" type="main"> <s id="N1007F">I 21: è un frammento di Mns. che si pubblica, e nel quale il V. richiama brevemente le <lb/>
ipotesi che erano state invocate a spiegare lo sviluppo dell’elettricità nello stro-<lb/>
finio, ed infine presenta, come più fondata, quella del contatto. </s><s id="N10085">È da notarsi <lb/>
che alcune frasi degli ultimi due periodi di questo Mns. sono comuni a E 24 <lb/>
(citato al <ref>N° VIII (B) del Vol. I</ref>), e che l’ultimo periodo è riportato per intero <lb/>
in <ref>una lettera a Martino Van Marum in data 11 ottobre 1792, pubblicata nel <lb/>
No VIII (B), Vol. I, pag. 135</ref>. </s> </p>

</cell> </row> </table>
xmlpage.tmpl Wed Oct 22 22:20:52 2014